<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1588 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759344</link>
    <description>The SC allowed an appeal in a specific performance suit involving agricultural land sale. The respondent-plaintiff sought specific performance of an agreement to sell 30 Kanals 8 Marlas at Rs.5,00,000/- per Killa, claiming payment of Rs.16,00,000/- earnest money. The SC found the agreement fraudulent, noting it was prepared on blank stamp paper with pre-obtained thumb impressions, significant blank spaces on unsigned pages, below-market pricing, and improbable circumstances of a Police Constable paying such amount without departmental permission. The SC concluded the entire case was fraud and concoction, setting aside the trial court, first appellate court, and HC judgments as perverse.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2024 13:45:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=771136" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1588 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759344</link>
      <description>The SC allowed an appeal in a specific performance suit involving agricultural land sale. The respondent-plaintiff sought specific performance of an agreement to sell 30 Kanals 8 Marlas at Rs.5,00,000/- per Killa, claiming payment of Rs.16,00,000/- earnest money. The SC found the agreement fraudulent, noting it was prepared on blank stamp paper with pre-obtained thumb impressions, significant blank spaces on unsigned pages, below-market pricing, and improbable circumstances of a Police Constable paying such amount without departmental permission. The SC concluded the entire case was fraud and concoction, setting aside the trial court, first appellate court, and HC judgments as perverse.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759344</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>