<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1594 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759350</link>
    <description>Where service tax, interest, and 25% of the penalty under Section 78(1) were paid within the stipulated period, the basis for sustaining further penal consequences did not survive. The amounts already paid were to be adjusted against the tax liability, and the penalties imposed under Section 77 and Section 78(1) of the Finance Act, 1994 were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2024 13:45:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=771130" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1594 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759350</link>
      <description>Where service tax, interest, and 25% of the penalty under Section 78(1) were paid within the stipulated period, the basis for sustaining further penal consequences did not survive. The amounts already paid were to be adjusted against the tax liability, and the penalties imposed under Section 77 and Section 78(1) of the Finance Act, 1994 were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759350</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>