<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1596 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759352</link>
    <description>CESTAT Ahmedabad held that appellant&#039;s rental income of Rs. 6,57,000 per annum qualified for service tax exemption under N/N. 33/2012-ST as it was below the Rs. 10,00,000 threshold. The tribunal ruled that service tax paid on reverse charge basis for GTA, security, insurance and transportation services could not be clubbed with rental service value. Since no Cenvat credit was availed for rental services specifically, the exemption notification&#039;s conditions were satisfied. The demand was set aside and appeal allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Sep 2024 13:27:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=771128" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1596 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759352</link>
      <description>CESTAT Ahmedabad held that appellant&#039;s rental income of Rs. 6,57,000 per annum qualified for service tax exemption under N/N. 33/2012-ST as it was below the Rs. 10,00,000 threshold. The tribunal ruled that service tax paid on reverse charge basis for GTA, security, insurance and transportation services could not be clubbed with rental service value. Since no Cenvat credit was availed for rental services specifically, the exemption notification&#039;s conditions were satisfied. The demand was set aside and appeal allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759352</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>