<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1608 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI - LB</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759364</link>
    <description>A co-borrower who signs loan and security documents and accepts joint and several liability can be treated as owing financial debt and proceeded against under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The text also states that a part-payment and later written acknowledgment extended limitation, so the application was not barred by time or by section 10A. Insufficiency of stamp duty in the facility agreement was treated as a curable admissibility defect that did not negate the underlying borrowing or default. Reliance on the MSME revival framework and SARFAESI measures did not displace the insolvency remedy, and the insolvency petition was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2024 13:45:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=771116" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1608 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI - LB</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759364</link>
      <description>A co-borrower who signs loan and security documents and accepts joint and several liability can be treated as owing financial debt and proceeded against under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The text also states that a part-payment and later written acknowledgment extended limitation, so the application was not barred by time or by section 10A. Insufficiency of stamp duty in the facility agreement was treated as a curable admissibility defect that did not negate the underlying borrowing or default. Reliance on the MSME revival framework and SARFAESI measures did not displace the insolvency remedy, and the insolvency petition was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759364</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>