https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759371 CESTAT Chennai allowed appeal partly in customs broker license revocation case. Tribunal found suspension order violated Regulation 20(2) limitation period but declined to examine its legality as revocation order was under challenge. Considering gravity of alleged offense didn't warrant "capital punishment" of license revocation and appellant's prolonged financial hardship since 2014 suspension served as sufficient deterrent. Tribunal ordered re-issuance of customs broker license subject to procedural compliance but upheld forfeiture of security deposit, balancing justice with consequences affecting appellant's family and employees' livelihoods. en-us Fri, 27 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 Sep 2024 13:45:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759371 CESTAT Chennai allowed appeal partly in customs broker license revocation case. Tribunal found suspension order violated Regulation 20(2) limitation period but declined to examine its legality as revocation order was under challenge. Considering gravity of alleged offense didn't warrant "capital punishment" of license revocation and appellant's prolonged financial hardship since 2014 suspension served as sufficient deterrent. Tribunal ordered re-issuance of customs broker license subject to procedural compliance but upheld forfeiture of security deposit, balancing justice with consequences affecting appellant's family and employees' livelihoods. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 27 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759371