<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1624 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759380</link>
    <description>The ITAT Hyderabad remanded both TDS and technology fees issues to the AO for fresh examination. Regarding TDS u/s 195 on payments to secondment employees, the tribunal found the DRP&#039;s conclusion that payments constituted Fee for Technical Services required deeper investigation of contractual clauses showing employer-employee relationship indicators. The AO must examine additional evidence and alternative pleas. For technology fees disallowance, while courts prohibit disallowing genuine expenses merely for lack of benefits, the assessee&#039;s email correspondence was insufficient to prove parent company rendered technical services. The tribunal directed fresh consideration of all evidence filed. Appeal allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Sep 2024 12:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=771100" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1624 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759380</link>
      <description>The ITAT Hyderabad remanded both TDS and technology fees issues to the AO for fresh examination. Regarding TDS u/s 195 on payments to secondment employees, the tribunal found the DRP&#039;s conclusion that payments constituted Fee for Technical Services required deeper investigation of contractual clauses showing employer-employee relationship indicators. The AO must examine additional evidence and alternative pleas. For technology fees disallowance, while courts prohibit disallowing genuine expenses merely for lack of benefits, the assessee&#039;s email correspondence was insufficient to prove parent company rendered technical services. The tribunal directed fresh consideration of all evidence filed. Appeal allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759380</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>