<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1634 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759390</link>
    <description>Refund applications under the GST enactments were to be processed, and any proposed rejection had to be supported by reasons after affording the applicant a hearing. The respondents stated that the applications would be processed within one month and that any adverse order would be preceded by reasons and an opportunity of hearing, so the petition was disposed of on that basis without any final adjudication of the refund claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2024 11:22:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=771090" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1634 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759390</link>
      <description>Refund applications under the GST enactments were to be processed, and any proposed rejection had to be supported by reasons after affording the applicant a hearing. The respondents stated that the applications would be processed within one month and that any adverse order would be preceded by reasons and an opportunity of hearing, so the petition was disposed of on that basis without any final adjudication of the refund claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759390</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>