<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (6) TMI 25 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38561</link>
    <description>A taxing amendment applies to an assessment year only from the start of that year unless the statute expressly gives it retrospective effect; an amendment brought into force after 1 April could not govern assessment year 1966-67, so the cancellation order and consequential assessment for that year were unsustainable. On the second issue, the finding that the assessee&#039;s holding exceeded the statutory ceiling of 50 standard acres for 1967-68 could not stand without a fresh and fair examination of the evidence, including the adangal extracts and a proper opportunity to substantiate them. The finding was therefore set aside and the matter remitted for reconsideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 12:27:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=77107" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (6) TMI 25 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38561</link>
      <description>A taxing amendment applies to an assessment year only from the start of that year unless the statute expressly gives it retrospective effect; an amendment brought into force after 1 April could not govern assessment year 1966-67, so the cancellation order and consequential assessment for that year were unsustainable. On the second issue, the finding that the assessee&#039;s holding exceeded the statutory ceiling of 50 standard acres for 1967-68 could not stand without a fresh and fair examination of the evidence, including the adangal extracts and a proper opportunity to substantiate them. The finding was therefore set aside and the matter remitted for reconsideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38561</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>