<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (11) TMI 554 - FOREIGN EXCHANGE REGULATION APPELLATE BOARD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457847</link>
    <description>The appeal concerning alleged contraventions of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973, concluded with the reduction of the penalty imposed on the appellant from Rs. 5,000 to Rs. 2,000, considering financial constraints. The appellant&#039;s failure to provide documentary evidence for the legal possession of foreign currency led to the upholding of the confiscation order. The appellant must deposit the reduced penalty within 45 days, failing which the Enforcement Directorate will recover the amount as per legal provisions. The judgment underscored the necessity of proving lawful possession and adherence to natural justice principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Sep 2024 16:20:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=771042" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (11) TMI 554 - FOREIGN EXCHANGE REGULATION APPELLATE BOARD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457847</link>
      <description>The appeal concerning alleged contraventions of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973, concluded with the reduction of the penalty imposed on the appellant from Rs. 5,000 to Rs. 2,000, considering financial constraints. The appellant&#039;s failure to provide documentary evidence for the legal possession of foreign currency led to the upholding of the confiscation order. The appellant must deposit the reduced penalty within 45 days, failing which the Enforcement Directorate will recover the amount as per legal provisions. The judgment underscored the necessity of proving lawful possession and adherence to natural justice principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457847</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>