<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1975 (9) TMI 12 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38558</link>
    <description>Expenditure incurred for employee remuneration and related reimbursement was deductible as business expenditure because it was found to have been spent for the assessee&#039;s business and was not an unlawful outlay. The fact that the payment arose in a statutory setting, or that the managed company had earlier been unable to secure sanction, did not by itself make the assessee&#039;s payment non-deductible. The deduction was therefore upheld on ordinary business principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 12:19:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=77104" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1975 (9) TMI 12 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38558</link>
      <description>Expenditure incurred for employee remuneration and related reimbursement was deductible as business expenditure because it was found to have been spent for the assessee&#039;s business and was not an unlawful outlay. The fact that the payment arose in a statutory setting, or that the managed company had earlier been unable to secure sanction, did not by itself make the assessee&#039;s payment non-deductible. The deduction was therefore upheld on ordinary business principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38558</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>