<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (10) TMI 532 - FOREIGN EXCHANGE REGULATION APPELLATE BOARD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457855</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, upholding the contravention finding under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973, but reduced the penalty from Rs. 22 lakhs to Rs. 7 lakhs due to the appellant&#039;s financial hardship. The appellant was given 45 days to pay the reduced amount, with recovery options available to the respondent if unpaid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Sep 2024 16:20:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=771034" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (10) TMI 532 - FOREIGN EXCHANGE REGULATION APPELLATE BOARD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457855</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, upholding the contravention finding under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973, but reduced the penalty from Rs. 22 lakhs to Rs. 7 lakhs due to the appellant&#039;s financial hardship. The appellant was given 45 days to pay the reduced amount, with recovery options available to the respondent if unpaid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457855</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>