<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (9) TMI 668 - FOREIGN EXCHANGE REGULATION APPELLATE BOARD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457857</link>
    <description>The Chairman allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned Adjudication Order under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973, due to insufficient evidence. The decision highlighted the necessity for corroborative evidence beyond a retracted confessional statement and criticized the investigation&#039;s reliance on unsubstantiated claims, emphasizing proper procedural adherence in regulatory violation cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Sep 2024 16:20:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=771032" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (9) TMI 668 - FOREIGN EXCHANGE REGULATION APPELLATE BOARD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457857</link>
      <description>The Chairman allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned Adjudication Order under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973, due to insufficient evidence. The decision highlighted the necessity for corroborative evidence beyond a retracted confessional statement and criticized the investigation&#039;s reliance on unsubstantiated claims, emphasizing proper procedural adherence in regulatory violation cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457857</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>