<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (9) TMI 666 - FOREIGN EXCHANGE REGULATION APPELLATE BOARD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457858</link>
    <description>Adjudication under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act was held unsustainable where relied upon documents were not supplied before the hearing, leaving the noticee without an effective opportunity to reply and defend. The proceedings were therefore required to be redone after disclosure of the requested materials and grant of reasonable time. Confiscation of Indian currency of Rs. 14,440 was also set aside because that amount related to a different search and was already covered by another show-cause notice, so the adjudicating authority lacked jurisdiction to order confiscation in the impugned proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Sep 2024 16:20:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=771031" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (9) TMI 666 - FOREIGN EXCHANGE REGULATION APPELLATE BOARD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457858</link>
      <description>Adjudication under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act was held unsustainable where relied upon documents were not supplied before the hearing, leaving the noticee without an effective opportunity to reply and defend. The proceedings were therefore required to be redone after disclosure of the requested materials and grant of reasonable time. Confiscation of Indian currency of Rs. 14,440 was also set aside because that amount related to a different search and was already covered by another show-cause notice, so the adjudicating authority lacked jurisdiction to order confiscation in the impugned proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457858</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>