<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1566 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759322</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, upholding the original assessment order and rejecting the PCIT&#039;s invocation of section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It concluded that the Assessing Officer had adequately considered the ownership details and exemption claim under section 54F, rendering the PCIT&#039;s directive for a fresh assessment unjustified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Sep 2024 08:11:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=770944" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1566 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759322</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, upholding the original assessment order and rejecting the PCIT&#039;s invocation of section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It concluded that the Assessing Officer had adequately considered the ownership details and exemption claim under section 54F, rendering the PCIT&#039;s directive for a fresh assessment unjustified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759322</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>