<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 1437 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457830</link>
    <description>An undisputed statutory alternative remedy barred the exercise of writ jurisdiction, so the writ petition was dismissed as not maintainable. The Court held that the petitioner must pursue the available appellate process, and reserved liberty to raise all substantive contentions before the appellate authority, leaving those issues to be decided in the statutory forum.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2024 21:11:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=770913" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 1437 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457830</link>
      <description>An undisputed statutory alternative remedy barred the exercise of writ jurisdiction, so the writ petition was dismissed as not maintainable. The Court held that the petitioner must pursue the available appellate process, and reserved liberty to raise all substantive contentions before the appellate authority, leaving those issues to be decided in the statutory forum.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457830</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>