https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457814 The complaint's rejection and refusal to issue directions under section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 were found to warrant fresh consideration because the earlier order was said to have cited precedents without applying them to the facts or addressing the relevant material. By consent, the matter was remanded to the Metropolitan Magistrate for reconsideration, with a direction to decide the complaint afresh and independently of the present observations. en-us Fri, 31 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Sep 2024 17:00:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457814 The complaint's rejection and refusal to issue directions under section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 were found to warrant fresh consideration because the earlier order was said to have cited precedents without applying them to the facts or addressing the relevant material. By consent, the matter was remanded to the Metropolitan Magistrate for reconsideration, with a direction to decide the complaint afresh and independently of the present observations. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 31 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457814