<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (6) TMI 842 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457810</link>
    <description>Condonation of delay in filing an appeal under the foreign exchange statute depends on proof of sufficient cause within the prescribed limitation framework. Here, the appellant failed to state when the adjudication order was received, did not explain the length of delay, and produced no satisfactory basis for late filing. Relying on the respondent&#039;s documentary material, the Tribunal found the order had been served much earlier and the delay was ex facie inordinate and unexplained. The appeal was therefore treated as time-barred and dismissed for want of sufficient cause.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2024 16:55:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=770894" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (6) TMI 842 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457810</link>
      <description>Condonation of delay in filing an appeal under the foreign exchange statute depends on proof of sufficient cause within the prescribed limitation framework. Here, the appellant failed to state when the adjudication order was received, did not explain the length of delay, and produced no satisfactory basis for late filing. Relying on the respondent&#039;s documentary material, the Tribunal found the order had been served much earlier and the delay was ex facie inordinate and unexplained. The appeal was therefore treated as time-barred and dismissed for want of sufficient cause.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457810</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>