<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (9) TMI 1008 - FOREIGN EXCHANGE REGULATION APPELLATE BOARD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457787</link>
    <description>Penalty for alleged foreign exchange contravention was held unsustainable where export proceeds were ultimately realised and the exporter had taken bona fide, reasonable steps to recover them. Bank certificates showed full realisation of the export value, and correspondence with the buyer, bank and Consulate General of India supported genuine recovery efforts. The absence of a legal notice was not treated as essential to prove effective steps. On that basis, the finding of contravention could not stand, and the adverse adjudication, including the penalty, was set aside with refund of the deposited amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2024 13:22:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=770853" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (9) TMI 1008 - FOREIGN EXCHANGE REGULATION APPELLATE BOARD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457787</link>
      <description>Penalty for alleged foreign exchange contravention was held unsustainable where export proceeds were ultimately realised and the exporter had taken bona fide, reasonable steps to recover them. Bank certificates showed full realisation of the export value, and correspondence with the buyer, bank and Consulate General of India supported genuine recovery efforts. The absence of a legal notice was not treated as essential to prove effective steps. On that basis, the finding of contravention could not stand, and the adverse adjudication, including the penalty, was set aside with refund of the deposited amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457787</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>