<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>NON-RENEWAL OF FIXED DEPOSITS ARISING OUT OF SEIZED CASH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=12968</link>
    <description>The court held that while a departmental circular for pre-deposits did not apply to seized cash refunds, the Department, as trustee of seized funds, cannot retain interest earned on fixed deposits made from such cash; interest payable should reflect the actual bank interest earned, and administrative responsibility must be fixed where fixed deposits were not renewed or interest calculations are unexplained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2024 11:49:25 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2024 11:49:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=770829" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>NON-RENEWAL OF FIXED DEPOSITS ARISING OUT OF SEIZED CASH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=12968</link>
      <description>The court held that while a departmental circular for pre-deposits did not apply to seized cash refunds, the Department, as trustee of seized funds, cannot retain interest earned on fixed deposits made from such cash; interest payable should reflect the actual bank interest earned, and administrative responsibility must be fixed where fixed deposits were not renewed or interest calculations are unexplained.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2024 11:49:25 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=12968</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>