<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>IT Support Remittances Not Taxable as Fees for Included Services Under India-USA Tax Treaty, Tribunal Rules.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81741</link>
    <description>Taxability of receipts as &#039;fees for included services&#039; under the India-USA Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA). The key points are: The Assessing Officer (AO) treated the remittances received by the assessee company from its sister concerns for providing IT support, maintenance services, etc., as &#039;fees for included services&#039; (FIS) u/s 9(1)(vii)(b) of the Income Tax Act and taxed the same u/s 115A. However, the assessee argued that merely providing complicated services with a nexus to the compensation received does not constitute FIS under the DTAA unless it satisfies the definition of FIS, which involves making available technical knowledge, expertise, skills, know-how, or processes. The Appellate Tribunal agreed with the assessee&#039;s .....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2024 08:35:14 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2024 08:35:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=770800" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>IT Support Remittances Not Taxable as Fees for Included Services Under India-USA Tax Treaty, Tribunal Rules.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81741</link>
      <description>Taxability of receipts as &#039;fees for included services&#039; under the India-USA Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA). The key points are: The Assessing Officer (AO) treated the remittances received by the assessee company from its sister concerns for providing IT support, maintenance services, etc., as &#039;fees for included services&#039; (FIS) u/s 9(1)(vii)(b) of the Income Tax Act and taxed the same u/s 115A. However, the assessee argued that merely providing complicated services with a nexus to the compensation received does not constitute FIS under the DTAA unless it satisfies the definition of FIS, which involves making available technical knowledge, expertise, skills, know-how, or processes. The Appellate Tribunal agreed with the assessee&#039;s .....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2024 08:35:14 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81741</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>