<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1496 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759252</link>
    <description>CESTAT New Delhi allowed the appeal and set aside the service tax demand. The tribunal held that the respondent rendered renting of immovable property service to unit holders through tripartite agreements for commercial spaces. However, since the underlying lease deed with the administration was terminated due to non-payment of conversion fees, all subsequent agreements including those with unit holders were repudiated. The tribunal found that no service was actually provided after termination, and advance amounts were refunded to unit holders. Consequently, the service tax demand under renting of immovable property service could not be sustained, and penalties were also set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2024 11:09:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=770779" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1496 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759252</link>
      <description>CESTAT New Delhi allowed the appeal and set aside the service tax demand. The tribunal held that the respondent rendered renting of immovable property service to unit holders through tripartite agreements for commercial spaces. However, since the underlying lease deed with the administration was terminated due to non-payment of conversion fees, all subsequent agreements including those with unit holders were repudiated. The tribunal found that no service was actually provided after termination, and advance amounts were refunded to unit holders. Consequently, the service tax demand under renting of immovable property service could not be sustained, and penalties were also set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759252</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>