https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759256 NCLAT Principal Bench held that substantial amendments to a petition without formal application were impermissible. The amended petition constituted a complete redraft with new reliefs, additional parties, and fresh oppression allegations. Citing precedent, the Tribunal ruled that such amendments required proper application allowing appellants opportunity to rebut. The impugned order violated natural justice principles by denying hearing opportunity to appellant. Appeal disposed off, emphasizing procedural compliance for substantial petition amendments. en-us Tue, 24 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Sep 2024 15:01:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759256 NCLAT Principal Bench held that substantial amendments to a petition without formal application were impermissible. The amended petition constituted a complete redraft with new reliefs, additional parties, and fresh oppression allegations. Citing precedent, the Tribunal ruled that such amendments required proper application allowing appellants opportunity to rebut. The impugned order violated natural justice principles by denying hearing opportunity to appellant. Appeal disposed off, emphasizing procedural compliance for substantial petition amendments. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 24 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759256