<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1508 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759264</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi allowed the assessee&#039;s claim under Section 11 despite non-filing of audit report in Form 10B with the return. The CIT(A) had rejected the claim, stating only CIT(Exemptions) could condone the delay. The ITAT held that filing Form 10B is directory, not mandatory, citing CBDT&#039;s relaxation in earlier years and HC precedents. The tribunal directed the AO to allow the Section 11 exemption claim, ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2024 16:44:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=770767" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1508 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759264</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi allowed the assessee&#039;s claim under Section 11 despite non-filing of audit report in Form 10B with the return. The CIT(A) had rejected the claim, stating only CIT(Exemptions) could condone the delay. The ITAT held that filing Form 10B is directory, not mandatory, citing CBDT&#039;s relaxation in earlier years and HC precedents. The tribunal directed the AO to allow the Section 11 exemption claim, ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759264</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>