<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1512 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759268</link>
    <description>ITAT Ahmedabad allowed the appeal and deleted additions made under Section 69A for unexplained cash deposits. The assessee, a small-scale garment trader, had not filed returns as income was below taxable limits. The tribunal found the assessee could not respond to notices as they were sent to former consultant&#039;s email address. Considering the business nature, income levels, and procedural issues, the tribunal held the addition was unjustified and directed its deletion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2024 10:02:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=770763" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1512 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759268</link>
      <description>ITAT Ahmedabad allowed the appeal and deleted additions made under Section 69A for unexplained cash deposits. The assessee, a small-scale garment trader, had not filed returns as income was below taxable limits. The tribunal found the assessee could not respond to notices as they were sent to former consultant&#039;s email address. Considering the business nature, income levels, and procedural issues, the tribunal held the addition was unjustified and directed its deletion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759268</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>