<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1974 (12) TMI 7 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38530</link>
    <description>Unilateral relief under the income-tax provisions was treated as governed by an earlier Bombay HC ruling on the same point, and the assessee&#039;s claim was accepted accordingly. A separate contribution made to managed mills for golden jubilee celebrations was held deductible because it was made to advance the assessee&#039;s business interests and earn greater commission. The Tribunal&#039;s finding that the expenditure was laid out wholly and exclusively for business purposes was treated as a supported finding of fact, and the recipient mills&#039; use of the funds did not change the expenditure&#039;s character from the assessee&#039;s perspective.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 11:05:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=77076" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1974 (12) TMI 7 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38530</link>
      <description>Unilateral relief under the income-tax provisions was treated as governed by an earlier Bombay HC ruling on the same point, and the assessee&#039;s claim was accepted accordingly. A separate contribution made to managed mills for golden jubilee celebrations was held deductible because it was made to advance the assessee&#039;s business interests and earn greater commission. The Tribunal&#039;s finding that the expenditure was laid out wholly and exclusively for business purposes was treated as a supported finding of fact, and the recipient mills&#039; use of the funds did not change the expenditure&#039;s character from the assessee&#039;s perspective.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38530</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>