<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1520 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759276</link>
    <description>The HC disposed of the writ petition by directing the petitioner to pay Rs. 2,50,000 instead of the initially required 20% of the disputed tax demand, acknowledging the petitioner&#039;s financial hardship. The court stayed tax recovery until the appeal&#039;s disposal, emphasizing efficient case handling and the importance of timely counter affidavit submissions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2024 08:18:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=770755" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1520 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759276</link>
      <description>The HC disposed of the writ petition by directing the petitioner to pay Rs. 2,50,000 instead of the initially required 20% of the disputed tax demand, acknowledging the petitioner&#039;s financial hardship. The court stayed tax recovery until the appeal&#039;s disposal, emphasizing efficient case handling and the importance of timely counter affidavit submissions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759276</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>