https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759289 A writ petition challenging part of an appellate order was treated as maintainable and covered by an earlier binding Division Bench order in the M/s. Maa Tarini Traders batch. The Court noted that the petitioner was seeking relief only against the portion of the order causing grievance, and the department did not dispute that the earlier precedent applied. It further applied the Division Bench's operative directions requiring a deposit while preserving liberty to pursue the statutory remedy after the Tribunal is reconstituted. The Court also noted that if the remedy is not pursued within the time allowed on reconstitution, the department remains free to proceed. en-us Wed, 07 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 May 2025 23:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759289 A writ petition challenging part of an appellate order was treated as maintainable and covered by an earlier binding Division Bench order in the M/s. Maa Tarini Traders batch. The Court noted that the petitioner was seeking relief only against the portion of the order causing grievance, and the department did not dispute that the earlier precedent applied. It further applied the Division Bench's operative directions requiring a deposit while preserving liberty to pursue the statutory remedy after the Tribunal is reconstituted. The Court also noted that if the remedy is not pursued within the time allowed on reconstitution, the department remains free to proceed. Case-Laws GST Wed, 07 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759289