<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1535 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759291</link>
    <description>Limitation under Section 75(10) of the CGST Act and the validity of an order passed under Section 74 when the show-cause notice had been issued under Section 73 were the central issues. The Madras HC noted the prima facie challenge to the assessment order on limitation and on the apparent mismatch between the notice and the final provision invoked. On that basis, it granted interim stay of the impugned order until the next date of hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 May 2025 21:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=770740" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1535 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759291</link>
      <description>Limitation under Section 75(10) of the CGST Act and the validity of an order passed under Section 74 when the show-cause notice had been issued under Section 73 were the central issues. The Madras HC noted the prima facie challenge to the assessment order on limitation and on the apparent mismatch between the notice and the final provision invoked. On that basis, it granted interim stay of the impugned order until the next date of hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759291</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>