https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457763 In a representative commercial dispute involving investors, the Delhi HC allowed impleadment applications by persons claiming membership of the same class, noting the common nature of the claims and the absence of objection from existing parties. It also allowed a Section 151 CPC request to correct inadvertent spelling and typographical errors in the earlier order, directing that the revised list of unit holders and investors be read into the record. The Court then accepted a consensual mechanism for disbursal of funds lying with the Registry, directing payment in terms of the agreed schedule, preserving parties' rights without prejudice, and issuing consequential directions including retention of any balance amount and deletion of a party. en-us Thu, 11 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 26 Sep 2024 23:32:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457763 In a representative commercial dispute involving investors, the Delhi HC allowed impleadment applications by persons claiming membership of the same class, noting the common nature of the claims and the absence of objection from existing parties. It also allowed a Section 151 CPC request to correct inadvertent spelling and typographical errors in the earlier order, directing that the revised list of unit holders and investors be read into the record. The Court then accepted a consensual mechanism for disbursal of funds lying with the Registry, directing payment in terms of the agreed schedule, preserving parties' rights without prejudice, and issuing consequential directions including retention of any balance amount and deletion of a party. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 11 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457763