<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1952 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457765</link>
    <description>The NCLAT modified the NCLT&#039;s order, allowing the appellant to file an additional affidavit within 15 days to introduce relevant facts of oppression and mismanagement. The Tribunal must consider these facts per guidelines, but new pleas cannot be raised unless previously pleaded. The company petition should be resolved expeditiously, ideally within one month, with no costs ordered.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2024 10:47:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=770726" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1952 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457765</link>
      <description>The NCLAT modified the NCLT&#039;s order, allowing the appellant to file an additional affidavit within 15 days to introduce relevant facts of oppression and mismanagement. The Tribunal must consider these facts per guidelines, but new pleas cannot be raised unless previously pleaded. The company petition should be resolved expeditiously, ideally within one month, with no costs ordered.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457765</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>