https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457760 The Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange, New Delhi, dismissed all three appeals due to procedural and substantive non-compliance. Appeal No. 444 of 1986 was dismissed as time-barred, exceeding the 90-day filing limit. Appeal No. 405 of 1986 was rejected for delay beyond 45 days and failure to deposit the penalty. Appeal No. 346 of 1986, although timely filed, was dismissed for non-deposit of the penalty and failure to realize export proceeds. The Appellants could not demonstrate compliance with statutory obligations under section 18 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973, leading to the dismissal of all appeals. en-us Fri, 22 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 26 Sep 2024 18:51:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457760 The Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange, New Delhi, dismissed all three appeals due to procedural and substantive non-compliance. Appeal No. 444 of 1986 was dismissed as time-barred, exceeding the 90-day filing limit. Appeal No. 405 of 1986 was rejected for delay beyond 45 days and failure to deposit the penalty. Appeal No. 346 of 1986, although timely filed, was dismissed for non-deposit of the penalty and failure to realize export proceeds. The Appellants could not demonstrate compliance with statutory obligations under section 18 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973, leading to the dismissal of all appeals. Case-Laws FEMA Fri, 22 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457760