<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (7) TMI 1336 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457748</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeals and directing the return of seized foreign currency and penalties deposited by the appellants. The Tribunal emphasized the insufficiency of evidence and lack of specific allegations in the charges, rendering the confiscation and penalties unjustified under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2024 17:19:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=770697" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (7) TMI 1336 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457748</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeals and directing the return of seized foreign currency and penalties deposited by the appellants. The Tribunal emphasized the insufficiency of evidence and lack of specific allegations in the charges, rendering the confiscation and penalties unjustified under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457748</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>