<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (7) TMI 1333 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457751</link>
    <description>Adjustment of unpaid export proceeds without prior Reserve Bank of India permission was treated as a contravention of foreign exchange law because the exporter remained obliged to realise the full export value unless authorised adjustment was permitted. The tribunal nevertheless found mitigating circumstances relevant to penalty: the amount involved was small, most export proceeds had been realised, and the conduct was attributed to business exigency rather than deliberate non-compliance. On that basis, the penalty quantum was reduced, and the separate penalty imposed on the managing partner was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2024 17:19:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=770694" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (7) TMI 1333 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457751</link>
      <description>Adjustment of unpaid export proceeds without prior Reserve Bank of India permission was treated as a contravention of foreign exchange law because the exporter remained obliged to realise the full export value unless authorised adjustment was permitted. The tribunal nevertheless found mitigating circumstances relevant to penalty: the amount involved was small, most export proceeds had been realised, and the conduct was attributed to business exigency rather than deliberate non-compliance. On that basis, the penalty quantum was reduced, and the separate penalty imposed on the managing partner was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457751</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>