https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457712 The tribunal allowed all four appeals, setting aside the impugned findings, penalties, and confiscation orders due to reliance on retracted and coerced statements, lack of independent evidence, and procedural irregularities. The adjudicating officer's findings were deemed flawed, rendering the enforcement actions legally unsustainable. The tribunal opted to hear the appeals on merits despite non-compliance with pre-deposit requirements, ensuring justice and preventing multiplicity of proceedings. en-us Thu, 06 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 26 Sep 2024 16:42:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457712 The tribunal allowed all four appeals, setting aside the impugned findings, penalties, and confiscation orders due to reliance on retracted and coerced statements, lack of independent evidence, and procedural irregularities. The adjudicating officer's findings were deemed flawed, rendering the enforcement actions legally unsustainable. The tribunal opted to hear the appeals on merits despite non-compliance with pre-deposit requirements, ensuring justice and preventing multiplicity of proceedings. Case-Laws FEMA Thu, 06 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457712