<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (10) TMI 702 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457713</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange modified the impugned order, reducing penalties imposed on the appellants and ordering the release of the seized amount. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of considering individual circumstances and mitigating factors in determining penalties, while also highlighting the necessity for a judicious approach in confiscation decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2024 16:42:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=770686" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (10) TMI 702 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457713</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange modified the impugned order, reducing penalties imposed on the appellants and ordering the release of the seized amount. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of considering individual circumstances and mitigating factors in determining penalties, while also highlighting the necessity for a judicious approach in confiscation decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457713</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>