<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (5) TMI 545 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457718</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal remanded the case for fresh adjudication, finding the Special Director&#039;s order inadequate and not in accordance with the law. It emphasized the need to address crucial issues and properly consider the defense raised by the appellants. The Tribunal directed the Special Director to complete the proceedings within three months, ensuring a fair reconsideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2024 16:42:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=770681" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (5) TMI 545 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457718</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal remanded the case for fresh adjudication, finding the Special Director&#039;s order inadequate and not in accordance with the law. It emphasized the need to address crucial issues and properly consider the defense raised by the appellants. The Tribunal directed the Special Director to complete the proceedings within three months, ensuring a fair reconsideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457718</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>