<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (5) TMI 543 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457719</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange reduced the penalty imposed on the appellant for contravening sections 9(1)(b) and 9(1)(d) of the FERA, 1973, from Rs. 10 lakhs to Rs. 1 lakh. The Tribunal ordered the appellant to deposit the remaining balance within three months, adjusting the confiscated Rs. 27,000 against the penalty. This decision balanced justice by offering relief to the appellant while maintaining accountability for the contravention.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2024 16:42:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=770680" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (5) TMI 543 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457719</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange reduced the penalty imposed on the appellant for contravening sections 9(1)(b) and 9(1)(d) of the FERA, 1973, from Rs. 10 lakhs to Rs. 1 lakh. The Tribunal ordered the appellant to deposit the remaining balance within three months, adjusting the confiscated Rs. 27,000 against the penalty. This decision balanced justice by offering relief to the appellant while maintaining accountability for the contravention.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457719</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>