<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (12) TMI 664 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457729</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the penalty imposed on the appellant under section 9(1)(b) of FERA, 1973, due to insufficient evidence and failure to meet the legal standard of proof. The tribunal ordered the release of the seized amount, emphasizing the lack of corroboration and voluntary confessional statements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2024 16:42:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=770670" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (12) TMI 664 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457729</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the penalty imposed on the appellant under section 9(1)(b) of FERA, 1973, due to insufficient evidence and failure to meet the legal standard of proof. The tribunal ordered the release of the seized amount, emphasizing the lack of corroboration and voluntary confessional statements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457729</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>