<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (10) TMI 821 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457731</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange in New Delhi allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty imposed on the appellant for alleged FERA violations. The Tribunal found the evidence insufficient and vague, lacking proper verification and specific findings on the main charge. Consequently, the Rs. 15,000 penalty was ordered to be refunded to the appellant within three months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2024 16:42:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=770668" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (10) TMI 821 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457731</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange in New Delhi allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty imposed on the appellant for alleged FERA violations. The Tribunal found the evidence insufficient and vague, lacking proper verification and specific findings on the main charge. Consequently, the Rs. 15,000 penalty was ordered to be refunded to the appellant within three months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457731</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>