<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (9) TMI 1188 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457735</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, modifying the Adjudication Order by reducing the penalty from Rs. 1,50,000 to Rs. 50,000 for contravention of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973. It acknowledged the appellant&#039;s efforts to realize export proceeds but emphasized the necessity of timely RBI applications for extensions. The already deposited amount was adjusted against the revised penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2024 16:42:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=770664" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (9) TMI 1188 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457735</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, modifying the Adjudication Order by reducing the penalty from Rs. 1,50,000 to Rs. 50,000 for contravention of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973. It acknowledged the appellant&#039;s efforts to realize export proceeds but emphasized the necessity of timely RBI applications for extensions. The already deposited amount was adjusted against the revised penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457735</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>