<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 1462 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457736</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant, with the penalty imposed under sections 18(2) and 18(3) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973, being quashed. The Chairperson recognized the appellant&#039;s compliance with section 18(3) and acknowledged the circumstances, including the buyer&#039;s refusal and the appellant&#039;s efforts to recover export proceeds. The appellant&#039;s inability to produce documents during adjudication due to a partner&#039;s illness was considered, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order. The decision underscored the appellant&#039;s reasonable actions and discharged burden of proof, resulting in the penalty being overturned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2024 16:42:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=770663" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 1462 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457736</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant, with the penalty imposed under sections 18(2) and 18(3) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973, being quashed. The Chairperson recognized the appellant&#039;s compliance with section 18(3) and acknowledged the circumstances, including the buyer&#039;s refusal and the appellant&#039;s efforts to recover export proceeds. The appellant&#039;s inability to produce documents during adjudication due to a partner&#039;s illness was considered, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order. The decision underscored the appellant&#039;s reasonable actions and discharged burden of proof, resulting in the penalty being overturned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457736</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>