<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 1456 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457743</link>
    <description>Seized documents recovered from a person&#039;s residence, containing unexplained foreign currency entries and conversion details, can support an adverse inference and sustain a finding of contravention of section 8 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 when not satisfactorily rebutted. At the same time, penalty computation must be confined to transactions actually attributable and proven; duplicated figures and amounts not properly linked to the appellant justified reduction of the monetary penalty. The adjudication on contravention was upheld, but the penalty was substantially scaled down on the basis of excessive computation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2024 16:42:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=770656" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 1456 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457743</link>
      <description>Seized documents recovered from a person&#039;s residence, containing unexplained foreign currency entries and conversion details, can support an adverse inference and sustain a finding of contravention of section 8 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 when not satisfactorily rebutted. At the same time, penalty computation must be confined to transactions actually attributable and proven; duplicated figures and amounts not properly linked to the appellant justified reduction of the monetary penalty. The adjudication on contravention was upheld, but the penalty was substantially scaled down on the basis of excessive computation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457743</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>