<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (7) TMI 1332 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457746</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the adjudication order against the appellant, a Senior Manager at a bank, who was penalized Rs. 25 lakhs for alleged contravention of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973. The Tribunal waived the pre-deposit requirement, found insufficient evidence of abetment, and concluded no violation occurred, thereby allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2024 16:42:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=770653" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (7) TMI 1332 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457746</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the adjudication order against the appellant, a Senior Manager at a bank, who was penalized Rs. 25 lakhs for alleged contravention of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973. The Tribunal waived the pre-deposit requirement, found insufficient evidence of abetment, and concluded no violation occurred, thereby allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457746</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>