<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (3) TMI 20 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38518</link>
    <description>The court upheld the imposition of the penalty within the limitation period under section 275(a)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, based on the completion of proceedings after a fresh assessment. The penalty amount of Rs. 9,168 was deemed appropriate, calculated at 2% per month for a 12-month delay, in line with provisions for unregistered firms. The writ petition challenging the penalty imposition and quantum was dismissed, with costs awarded against the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 10:27:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=77064" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (3) TMI 20 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38518</link>
      <description>The court upheld the imposition of the penalty within the limitation period under section 275(a)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, based on the completion of proceedings after a fresh assessment. The penalty amount of Rs. 9,168 was deemed appropriate, calculated at 2% per month for a 12-month delay, in line with provisions for unregistered firms. The writ petition challenging the penalty imposition and quantum was dismissed, with costs awarded against the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38518</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>