<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1406 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759162</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed an appeal regarding stamp duty liability on sale agreements executed prior to sale deeds for two properties. The Court held that sale agreements were the principal instruments requiring proper stamp duty and registration, not the subsequent sale deeds. Despite appellants&#039; argument that stamp duty paid on final sale deeds absolved prior liability, the Court ruled that Section 4 of the Stamp Act could not aid appellants since the agreements involved property values above Rs.100, included possession transfer clauses, and created possessory rights under Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act. The trial court&#039;s impoundment of documents and direction for stamp duty adjudication was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2024 08:15:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=770593" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1406 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759162</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed an appeal regarding stamp duty liability on sale agreements executed prior to sale deeds for two properties. The Court held that sale agreements were the principal instruments requiring proper stamp duty and registration, not the subsequent sale deeds. Despite appellants&#039; argument that stamp duty paid on final sale deeds absolved prior liability, the Court ruled that Section 4 of the Stamp Act could not aid appellants since the agreements involved property values above Rs.100, included possession transfer clauses, and created possessory rights under Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act. The trial court&#039;s impoundment of documents and direction for stamp duty adjudication was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759162</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>