<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1411 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759167</link>
    <description>The tribunal set aside the Original Authority&#039;s order, allowing the appeal based on the limitation issue. It found the Revenue failed to establish suppression necessary for invoking the extended period of limitation. The appellant&#039;s incorrect CENVAT credit claim was not supported by substantial evidence of suppression, rendering the demand unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 10:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=770588" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1411 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759167</link>
      <description>The tribunal set aside the Original Authority&#039;s order, allowing the appeal based on the limitation issue. It found the Revenue failed to establish suppression necessary for invoking the extended period of limitation. The appellant&#039;s incorrect CENVAT credit claim was not supported by substantial evidence of suppression, rendering the demand unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759167</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>