<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1419 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759175</link>
    <description>In a PMLA bail matter, the Court found prima facie material suggesting the petitioner&#039;s involvement in a forged-deed and land-record manipulation chain linked to proceeds of crime, and held that regular bail was not warranted. It distinguished the cited bail precedents as factually different, including cases lacking prima facie participation or involving a different statutory setting. The objection based on Section 19 of the PMLA was also rejected because the grievance had not been raised at the time of remand and was taken much later. On the facts and seriousness of the alleged offence, the bail application failed and custody continued.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2024 08:15:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=770580" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1419 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759175</link>
      <description>In a PMLA bail matter, the Court found prima facie material suggesting the petitioner&#039;s involvement in a forged-deed and land-record manipulation chain linked to proceeds of crime, and held that regular bail was not warranted. It distinguished the cited bail precedents as factually different, including cases lacking prima facie participation or involving a different statutory setting. The objection based on Section 19 of the PMLA was also rejected because the grievance had not been raised at the time of remand and was taken much later. On the facts and seriousness of the alleged offence, the bail application failed and custody continued.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759175</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>