https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759176 A formal arrest under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act does not fail merely because the person is already in judicial custody in another case. Where the accused is not taken into physical custody by the arresting agency, the 24-hour production requirement is not applied in the same manner as a regular arrest. The special statutory scheme governing arrest and remand, read with the provision giving it effect despite the Code of Criminal Procedure where consistent, was treated as controlling. On that basis, the arrest was held not vitiated for breach of the production requirement, and the challenge to the arrest order failed. en-us Fri, 30 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 26 Sep 2024 08:15:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759176 A formal arrest under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act does not fail merely because the person is already in judicial custody in another case. Where the accused is not taken into physical custody by the arresting agency, the 24-hour production requirement is not applied in the same manner as a regular arrest. The special statutory scheme governing arrest and remand, read with the provision giving it effect despite the Code of Criminal Procedure where consistent, was treated as controlling. On that basis, the arrest was held not vitiated for breach of the production requirement, and the challenge to the arrest order failed. Case-Laws Money Laundering Fri, 30 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759176