<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1425 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759181</link>
    <description>NCLAT dismissed the appeal challenging rejection of Section 7 application as time-barred. The court determined actual default date was 26.02.2001 (not 01.06.2019 as claimed), making the application filed on 19.12.2019 beyond the three-year limitation period under Article 137. While NCLAT allowed exclusion of periods during SICA proceedings (12.09.2002 to 06.06.2006 and 23.11.2006 to 29.09.2010), subsequent acknowledgments in 2015-16 balance sheet occurred after limitation period expired. The court upheld the adjudicating authority&#039;s decision that the application was filed well beyond permissible time limits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2024 08:15:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=770574" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1425 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759181</link>
      <description>NCLAT dismissed the appeal challenging rejection of Section 7 application as time-barred. The court determined actual default date was 26.02.2001 (not 01.06.2019 as claimed), making the application filed on 19.12.2019 beyond the three-year limitation period under Article 137. While NCLAT allowed exclusion of periods during SICA proceedings (12.09.2002 to 06.06.2006 and 23.11.2006 to 29.09.2010), subsequent acknowledgments in 2015-16 balance sheet occurred after limitation period expired. The court upheld the adjudicating authority&#039;s decision that the application was filed well beyond permissible time limits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759181</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>