<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1427 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759183</link>
    <description>Imported old, used and worn clothing was treated as a restricted item, and confiscation under the Customs Act was upheld because the licensing requirement had admittedly not been complied with. The Tribunal followed its earlier view on similar imports and found no infirmity in the appellate order reducing the redemption fine and penalty. It held that the reduced amounts were already sufficient to meet the ends of justice, so no further interference was warranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2024 08:15:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=770572" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1427 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759183</link>
      <description>Imported old, used and worn clothing was treated as a restricted item, and confiscation under the Customs Act was upheld because the licensing requirement had admittedly not been complied with. The Tribunal followed its earlier view on similar imports and found no infirmity in the appellate order reducing the redemption fine and penalty. It held that the reduced amounts were already sufficient to meet the ends of justice, so no further interference was warranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759183</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>